Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Kodiaq vs Peugeot 5008

Verdict
First place: Peugeot 5008


Peugeot’s 5008 has aped the successful recipe of the 3008, adding seating for seven. In this spec it’s more affordable, better equipped and more comfortable than the Kodiaq, and while it’s not quite as good to drive, it’ll be cost-effective to run. Lots of tech and practicality combine with an attractive list price (including PCP) to make this downsized large petrol SUV a likeable choice.

Second place: Skoda Kodiaq

Skoda’s Kodiaq is still the choice for keener drivers. The responsive engine and positive gearbox are good, but the Skoda is still composed and relatively comfortable. It mixes this with usability and tech – although some items are optional on SE trim. With all manual models getting 4x4, CO2 emissions are higher, but the performance benefits aren’t that great over the 5008.

Third place: Nissan X-Trail

The X-Trail’s updates are too subtle to allow it to compete against two of the best cars in the business here. It doesn’t have such a high-quality feel and is lacking in terms of infotainment. There’s no doubting the Nissan’s versatility, and it even drives acceptably, but that’s not good enough in such a competitive class. These factors combined mean the X-Trail is an also-ran in this test



Comunque Kodiaq e' un 4x4..............., mentre altri due 4x2, poi non ho capito perche'non provano mai il 5008 1.6 THP 165 cv !? Io francamente se dovessi prendere un Suv di queste dimensioni ecc non prenderei mai in considerazione un motore 1.2 , 1.4 ecc nonostante sia valido , elastico ecc.....



5008 1.2 PureTech 130 GT ___ Kodiaq 1.4 TSI 4x4 SE____X-Trail DIG-T 163

Length/wheelbase_ 4,641/2,840mm_ 4,697/2,791mm_ 4,690/2,705mm
Height/width_ 1,646/1,844mm_ 1,655/1,882mm_ 1,710/1,820mm
Engine 3cyl in-line/1,199cc_ 4cyl in-line/1,395cc_ 4cyl in/1,618cc
Peak power/revs 129/5,500 bhp/rpm_ 148/5,000 bhp/rpm_ 161/5,600 bhp/rpm
Peak torque/revs 230/1,750 Nm/rpm_ 250/1,500 Nm/rpm_ 240/2,000 Nm/rpm
Transmission 6-speed man/fwd_ 6-speed man/fwd_ 6-speed man/fwd
Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel_ 56 litres/space saver_ 60 litres/£100_ 60 litres/yes
Boot capacity (7/5/2 seats)_ 167/952/2,042 litres_ 270/560-765/2,005 l_ 135/445/1,996 litres
Kerbweight/payload/towing weight_ 1,310/810/1,200kg? 1,658/762/2,000kg_ 1,460/750/1,800kg
Turning circle 11.2 metres 11.6 metres 11.2 metres

0-60/30-70mph_ 11.1/10.3 secs_ 9.8/9.2 secs_ 10.2/8.8 secs
30-50mph in 3rd/4th_ 4.4/6.6 secs_ 4.2/5.6 secs_ 4.5/6.7 secs
50-70mph in 5th/6th_ 8.7/11.0 secs_ 8.6/11.2 secs_ 9.6/13.8 secs
Top speed/rpm at 70mph_ 117mph/2,400rpm_ 121mph/2,500rpm_ 124mph/2,250rpm
Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph_ 48.3/34.6/8.3m_ 49.7/37.8/11.1m _50.2/36.3/10.4m
Noise outside/idle/30/70mph_ 68/52/60/71dB_ 70/53/61/70dB_ 69/53/64/71dB
Auto Express econ. (mpg/mpl)/range 41.9/9.2/516 miles 43.5/9.6/574 miles 38.3/8.4/505 miles
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined 47.1/62.8/55.4mpg 34.0/47.1/40.9mpg 35.8/53.3/45.6mpg
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined 10.4/13.8/12.2mpl 7.5/10.4/9.0mpl 7.9/11.7/10.0mpl
Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket 156/117g/km/22% 150/156g/km/30% 170/145g/km/28%

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-reviews/101534/nissan-x-trail-vs-skoda-kodiaq-vs-peugeot-5008

 

Che strano, un articolo su una Peugeot che vince un confronto...

 

Sono veramente brutte le Peugeot suv o monovolume di ultima tendenza. Tanto mi piacciono la 308 e la 208. Per non parlare della Opel grandland che ho visto stamani.